News from Washington post: True or Fake (No. 119)

0  150USD start bounty
150USD current bounty
Accredited A+ Magna Cum Laude
posted by Winter967

PDF Revisions:


View: PDF Viewer | Thumbnail | PDF Embed


News Article Summary
You decide!



We are proud to announce that the following document WP version 119 achieved the ChainBLX opinion based accreditation on .

This accreditation testifies that it is our professional opinion as well as the opinion of our community that whitepaper is in compliance with the professional standard brought forward and regulated by

Document reached its accreditation with the following statistics.

A ChainBLX accreditation is very difficult to archive and in no way should any statistic be indicative of the quality of the document at hand. Neither should the achievement of accreditation in anyway imply that investors should conduct their own diligence prior to any investment.

Likes of forum members: 0 with a total of number of claims asserted and total of claims dismissed .

The discussion forum will remain open for future discussion, the remainder of the bounty will be reimbursed to the owner and no future claims can be filed.

In the name of the community and ChainBLX

We wish the best of success.

Winter967Winter967 Reputation: 0
Status: White Paper Owner
Send Message

This is my test post like I said on Reddit. Here’s a link

Winter967Winter967 Reputation: 0
Status: White Paper Owner
Send Message

I posted this article for review because I think the Washington Post is creating fake news, with a strong bias to the left. Ironically, the posted article is their attempt to debunk President's Trump statement that the US has 'spent' 7 trillion dollars in the Mid East. They say, 'well the money isn't actually spent yet, it is only allocated, so he is lying.' But the president is perfectly right to say the money is 'spent'. If you buy a car for $20k and only put $5k down, you still have 'spent' $20k on a car. You have an obligation to pay the rest or you go bankrupt.

karlkarl Reputation: 0
Status: White Paper Owner
Send Message

In my opinion the Washington Post is correct. "We have spent" is past. Therefore the money should be already gone and therefore a sunk cost. But in reality the money is not gone yet. Hence it is a future obligation.

HopeHKHopeHK Reputation: 0
Status: Bounty Hunter
Send Message

I agree. He should have said "we have committed 7 trillion" not "we have spent 7 trillion". It is deliberately misleading.

erikreed89erikreed89 Reputation: 0
Status: Bounty Hunter
Send Message

I believe this is fake news, because, as many others have stated, it should have been worded as "committed" instead of "spent".

onderI1sonderI1s Reputation: 0
Status: Bounty Hunter
Send Message

I think this is not true because this is a projection of the amount to be spent 7 trillion.It is not yet actually spent.

Sign In or Register to comment.