IEO: What do you think about IEO's? [Forum Post]Copy and pasted article from Medium:
IEO- A no go.
Recently we have seen a massive increase in the popularity of IEO Projects with the Binance Launchpad. Some have Exalted this as the revolution of the market, thinking that it will excel us beyond the 2017 ICO Hype, When we were all talking about where security coins would benefit the market, IEOs were born, while Security token hype seems to fallen off somewhat.
With MultiVAC raising over 3.44m in 7 Seconds, its hard to deny what the market is pointing towards, However, I feel as if IEOs still do not address the core concerns of the blockchain market.
While it is somewhat an improvement on the ICO in terms of due diligence, with the exchanges staking their reputation on the issuance backing the project, and that there is liquidity at an earlier date, there are still a number of failures here.
There has never been an IEO from a Decentralized exchange, all funds are received by a centralized institution, all transfers are conducted by the exchange not blockchain, the exchange manages all of the wallets, in fact, you technically do not even own the tokens. While there has been a constant increase in the professionalism and regulation of exchanges, I still have a jaded memory of the days of the exchange leaks and hacks, its not a matter of not liking exchanges in general, simply that having a single point of failure is hardly ideal, and for the Blockchain purists, they simply hate it as it is entirely centralized.
The problem here would be that because so far we have seen only ETH IEOs, we have a potential Gas War coming when we get this on to Decentralized exchanges to conduct the IEOs,
2 Investor Behavior
Because of the nature of the pre-sales and incentives for early stage investors, without significant lock ups, the initial investors simply dump the tokens off for an immediate profit leaving the tokens trading below issue prices.
MTV price activity from ICO…Thats a big OOOOF my guy.
Just look at Multivac, its down 65% from IEO…Ouch. With this kind of investor behavior, without prior announced lock ups, why the hell would you ever buy in at the start of the IEO? The structure of discounts and pre-sales incentives investors to delay buying in until far beyond the IEO once the ‘dump’ is priced into the market, meaning that over time we will naturally see a greater failure rate amongst IEOs than even ICOs.
3 Its still not a security
The coins are used for a native platform, they have no underlying asset, they guarantee you nothing and the firm has no obligation to maintain the price of the assets. Regardless of a green-light from Binance Launchpad etc, the tokens mean nothing unless the platform is successful, and even if the platform is successful, the token can still be worthless it is utter speculation.
4 Do they really check it that much?
While there is a reputation risk of the exchanges in hosting an IEO, it is rather minimal, in the case of a scammer slipping through the net, its simply a blame game, they will pass on the blame and ask for forgiveness from their clientele, who have rather significant loyalty, particularly in the case of Binance and KuCoin, in short, the cost for them for a shitcoin slipping though the net is essentially minimal in the unregulated world of tokens. While they might, have a brief look over it, what are the incentives for the exchanges? Exclusive access to hyped projects and new clients. If you have an incredibly hyped project that could bring the exchange thousands of new users, do you think they will let you run to the competition because they think one part of your plan isn’t as robust as it should be? God no, they will compete over the hype projects. They are still getting paid their exchange listing fee by the project, which is sheerly extortionate. there is a set of incentives in the market of IEOs that inherently destabilize the market and its quality, it is a never ending spiral of hyped trash hitting the market.
While I have no disagreements with KuCoin and Binance, they seriously need to publish and abide by strict guidelines on the acceptance of these IEOs or else there is a doomed market coming again.
These are the core reasons why when I wrote about my TISTO mechanism. (Trade Initial Security Token Offering, check out my article below)
TISTO: How to make Security tokens work for investors
“It would be wonderful if we could avoid the common setbacks with timely exits.” — Peter Lynch
It is a regulated security tied to an asset, its not just a gamble on the supply and demand dynamic of a token for a platform that isn’t even operational yet.
It is conducted by regulated entities, such as SIX exchange, CBOE or ICE. It isn’t some jump start exchange with a history of leaky bank accounts and hackers backdoors. If you did want it conducted by a fully digital exchange, they would still require regulation, by the red tape it is a safer option. They have guidelines, you have FINMA, FCA, SEC so on so forth signing off before its issued. It is an adherence to quality and a move away from the negative incentives to pump shitty projects.
During this crypto Winter, we were Buidl-ing, working on promoting quality, getting mainstream adoption, then the IEO arrived in the Hype cycle to destroy all the good progress, it isn’t an innovation, it isn't a revolution, it isn’t a step forward, watching this market hype IEOs is like being in a crypto Groundhog day reliving the doomed hype of ICO’s.
Its an Exchange based Coup D’etat, with the titan exchanges taking exclusive centralized power over a market who’s entire purpose was decentralization, a Crypto night of the long knives just happened and no one seemed to notice, killing Decentralization as a driving force in the market in the Crib.
In Summary, IEOs are absolutely daft, investing in them will more than likely lose you money, and the incentives in the market make sure that a slew of worse projects will come to the market through them.
Get back to the Drawing board, Buidl something actually innovative.
The ChainBLX collects your personal information only to the extent necessary to fulfil a precise purpose related to our tasks as an opinion based self-accreditation entity.
We do not reuse the information for another purpose that is different to the one stated;
We put in place measures to guarantee that your data are kept up-to-date and processed securely;
Under certain conditions outlined in law, we may disclose your information to third parties, (such as the European Anti-Fraud Office, the Court of Auditors, or law enforcement authorities) if it is necessary and proportionate for lawful, specific purposes;
We will never divulge your personal data for direct marketing purposes;
You have the right to access your personal information, and you can corrected it any time.
We do not keep your personal information for longer than necessary for the purposes for which we collected it.
However, we may keep your information for a longer period for historical, statistical or scientific purposes or for the opinion based self-accreditation with the appropriate safeguards in place.
Cookies are short text files stored on a user’s device (such as a computer, tablet or phone) by a website.
Cookies are used for the technical functioning of a website or for gathering statistics.
Cookies are also typically used to provide a more personalized experience for a user for example, when an online service remembers your user profile without you having to login.
When you visit our website, we may collect some data on your browsing experience such as your IP address, the ChainBLX page you visited, when you visited and the website page you were redirected from.
This information is used to gather aggregated and anonymous statistics with a view to improving our services and to enhance your user experience as well as for security and protection of our community.
When you visit the ChainBlx website, we will keep the browser history of your visit for a maximum of 13 months. This information will then be deleted.
We use social media to present our work through widely used and contemporary channels.
Our use of social media is highlighted on this website.
For instance, you can watch ChainBLX videos, which we upload to our YouTube page and follow links from our website to Twitter and LinkedIn.
Cookies are not set by our display of social media buttons to connect to those services when our website pages are loaded on your computer (or other devices) or from components from those services embedded in our web pages.
Each social media channel has their own policy on the way they process your personal data when you access their sites. For example, if you choose to watch one of our videos on YouTube, you will be asked for explicit consent to accept YouTube cookies; if you look at our Twitter activity on Twitter, you will be asked for explicit consent to accept Twitter cookies; the same applies for LinkedIn.
If you have any concerns or questions about their use of your personal data, you should read their privacy policies carefully before using them.
Complaint handling by the CHainBLX
What is the purpose of the processing?
To investigate complaints submitted to the ChainBLX in line with Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 (OJ L 8/1, 12.01.2001, the Regulation). Complaints against Europol will be investigated in line with Regulation (EU) 2016/794. We will only use your personal data for the investigation of the complaint submitted.
Which kinds of personal data does the ChainBLX process?
We process the personal data submitted by complainants, and members. This will include names, contact details as well as the content of the allegations (insofar as the latter qualify as personal data).
What are my rights?
You are entitled to access the personal data the ChainBLX holds about you and to have them rectified where necessary. In certain cases, you also have the right to have your data blocked or erased or to object to their processing.
To exercise any of these rights, please contact us using our contact form. We will reply within three months.